A Mumbai-based non-resident Indian (NRI), who is a tax resident of Singapore, has successfully secured exemption from paying Indian income tax on over Rs 1.35 crore earned from mutual fund investments in India. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Mumbai ruled in her favor after examining the India-Singapore Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) in detail.
The decision highlights how treaty provisions can safeguard NRIs from double taxation, particularly when domestic authorities attempt to levy tax contrary to DTAA rules.
Tax Authorities Deny Exemption Initially
The NRI had sold both debt and equity mutual fund units in India during the assessment year 2022-23 and claimed exemption from Indian tax on short-term capital gains. She relied on Article 13 of the India-Singapore DTAA, which allocates taxing rights for capital gains to the country of residence.
However, the income tax department rejected her claim, asserting that mutual fund units derive substantial value from Indian assets, making the gains taxable in India. The Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) upheld this view, prompting the taxpayer to escalate the matter to ITAT Mumbai.
Also Read: FreshToHome Plans Rs 75 Crore Debt Raise to Strengthen Operations
Core Legal Question Before ITAT
The central issue before the Tribunal was whether capital gains from mutual fund units held by a Singapore tax resident could be taxed in India or should be exclusively taxable in Singapore under the residuary clause of Article 13(5) of the DTAA.
Chartered Accountant Suresh Surana explained that Article 13(4) of the treaty applies specifically to the sale of shares in companies, while Article 13(5) covers property not explicitly mentioned elsewhere, including mutual fund units. The ITAT noted that mutual fund units are legally distinct from company shares under Indian law.
Mutual Fund Units Recognized as Separate from Shares
Under Indian law, mutual funds are constituted as trusts regulated by SEBI and not as companies. Their units cannot be equated with shares of a company. ITAT Mumbai relied on judicial precedents under other treaties, including India-UAE and India-Switzerland DTAAs, which consistently recognized mutual fund units as distinct from shares.
The Tribunal further emphasized that Article 3(2) of the DTAA requires undefined terms, such as “shares,” to derive meaning from Indian domestic law. The Companies Act, 2013 defines shares in the capital of a company, while mutual fund units are issued under SEBI regulations and fall under a separate category of securities.
Treaty Benefits Override Domestic Law
ITAT Mumbai concluded that capital gains from mutual fund units do not fall under Article 13(4) but are covered by Article 13(5) of the India-Singapore DTAA. This provision grants exclusive taxing rights to the country of residence of the investor, in this case, Singapore.
The Tribunal also reinforced that, under Section 90(2) of the Income-tax Act, DTAA provisions prevail over domestic law if they are more beneficial to the taxpayer. Consequently, India could not tax the NRI’s short-term capital gains, and the appeal was allowed in full.
Precedents Strengthen the Decision
In reaching its decision, ITAT Mumbai referenced earlier cases, such as the ITAT Cochin ruling in K.E. Faizal v. DCIT (India-UAE DTAA). That case similarly held that capital gains from mutual fund units, being distinct from shares, are taxable only in the country of residence of the investor.
No publicly reported High Court rulings have overturned these ITAT decisions, and they continue to be cited by tribunals handling comparable cases involving DTAAs with residuary capital gains provisions.
Key Takeaways for NRIs
The case underscores the importance of understanding DTAA provisions when investing in India. Capital gains from mutual fund units held by non-resident investors may not be taxable in India if the investor is a resident of a country with a relevant treaty containing a residuary capital gains clause.
The ITAT Mumbai ruling, recorded as case No.174/MUM/2025, has become a reference point for NRIs seeking clarity on cross-border taxation of mutual fund investments, demonstrating that treaty benefits can effectively prevent double taxation when properly invoked.
Also Read: LIC Suffers Rs 11,500 Crore Notional Loss as ITC Shares Slide Sharply
