In an era where every product is marketed as “green” or “eco-conscious,” a quietly viral post by Pankti Pandey, an environmental researcher and former ISRO scientist, has stirred up an overdue conversation about something as ordinary and overlooked as the cup in your hand. Sustainable Cups, Are you using the right one?

Is a paper cup better than plastic? Is mitti (earthenware) more sustainable than glass? What about that steel tumbler sitting at the back of your kitchen shelf?

Pandey, who has a background in both science and sustainability, argues that the answer lies not in intuition or aesthetics, but in Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), a detailed scientific methodology to measure a product’s total environmental impact, from raw material extraction to disposal.

Her viral LinkedIn post exposes the illusion of greenwashing and highlights India’s recycling inefficiencies and behavioural gaps that undermine the sustainability of so-called “eco-friendly” products.

The Cup Showdown: Fact-Checked, Not Feel-Good

Here’s how the five most commonly used cups fare when assessed on production, recyclability, and long-term sustainability, especially within India’s unique waste management context.

Plastic Cup: The Misunderstood Villain?

• Made from: Fossil fuels (mostly petroleum)
• Pros: Lightweight (low transport emissions), recyclable 4–5 times
• Cons: Only ~8% of India’s plastic is recycled; the rest chokes landfills or ends up in waterways.
• Reality Check: Despite recyclability, most plastic cups are not reused or recycled due to lack of segregation and consumer habits. Its lightweight nature makes it prone to becoming litter.

Paper Cup: The Faux Green Hero

• Made from: Wood pulp with a thin polyethylene plastic lining
• Pros: Perceived eco-friendly, easy branding
• Cons: The lining makes them nearly non-recyclable in most Indian cities. Paper recycling in India (~30%) largely excludes food-soiled waste.
• Reality Check: Paper cups often generate more emissions throughout their lifecycle than plastic ones, particularly considering the impact of deforestation, water usage, and the energy-intensive pulping process.

Mitti Cup: Earthy but Energy-Hungry

• Made from: Natural clay
• Pros: Biodegradable (eventually), no chemicals
• Cons: Requires high-temperature kiln firing (~1000°C+), making it energy-intensive. Fragile and single-use.
• Reality Check: While rooted in Indian tradition, the mitti cup doesn’t scale well for sustainable mass adoption due to high breakage rates and energy demands.

Glass Cup: Durable but Demanding

• Made from: Silica, soda ash, limestone (mined), processed at 1400–1600°C
• Pros: Reusable, 100% recyclable without loss of quality; ~45% of industrial glass waste is recycled in India
• Cons: Heavy (high transport emissions), fragile
• Reality Check: Excellent for stationary and long-term use (e.g., cafés, offices), but not feasible for large-scale takeaway systems.

Steel Cup: The Quiet Winner

• Made from: Iron ore and alloys; high energy input during production
• Pros: 10-15 year lifespan, 100% recyclable without degradation; India has a robust steel recycling system
• Cons: Initial carbon footprint is high, but amortized over years of use
• Reality Check: In Indian homes, community kitchens, and events, steel cups already reign as the long-term sustainable option. Their true power lies in reuse.

Beyond the Material: The Bigger Truth

Pandey’s key takeaway? “Material is just half the story.”

Sustainability doesn’t stop at what the cup is made of, it depends on how long it’s used, how it’s disposed of, and whether local infrastructure can actually recycle it. A “recyclable” cup that lands in a landfill is no better than one that never claimed to be green in the first place.

According to environmental researchers, lifecycle emissions from a plastic cup recycled efficiently could be lower than those from a paper or mitti cup that ends up in a landfill or decomposes over decades.

India’s Recycling Reality Check

• Plastic: India generates over 3.5 million tonnes of plastic waste annually, but only recycles ~8%, per CPCB data (2023).
• Paper: While 30% of paper waste is recycled, food-soiled paper like cups is largely unrecyclable.
• Glass & Steel: Both fare better in industrial recycling systems glass at ~45%, steel even higher largely thanks to India’s informal sector and scrap ecosystem.

So, What’s the Best Cup?

According to Pandey and increasingly, to data the most sustainable cup is the one you carry with you.

“If you’re still debating which single-use cup is better,” she writes, “you’re already asking the wrong question.”

Sustainability, it seems, is less about choosing between bad options and more about avoiding the need to choose at all. The humble steel cup, reused over years, emerges as the quiet climate hero in a debate filled with noisy “green” claims.

Disposability Normalised

In the pursuit of convenience, we’ve normalized disposability. But as climate urgency mounts, perhaps it’s time to shift from choosing the lesser evil to embracing reusability as a lifestyle not just a hashtag.

So, next time you grab a drink on the go, maybe carry your own steel cup. It’s not just responsible, it’s revolutionary.

Also Read: 8 Startup Models That Are Blueprints for Disruption